Everyone involved in measurement technology knows the somewhat flippant ? but very catchy ? statement: ?In the event that you measure a whole lot, you measure nothing!? What is meant by this is: You can measure a lot. However the values are only useful if you can validate them. In everyday life, for example, one may be surprised once the scales at home show a large deviation from those at the physician?s or the bicycle speedometer deviates many hundreds of metres from the GPS instrument. The saying also often alludes to our tendency to generate a lot more data in our modern world, without thinking about its evaluation. To be able to obtain valid data with which to continue working, it really is worthwhile for industrial measuring instruments to be calibrated regularly.
For the individual, the highest accuracy may not be important. In industrial applications, however, it really is precisely this that can make the crucial difference between rejects and the highest quality ? hence the calibration of the measuring instruments. It serves to complement the measuring device with the national standard ? in short: to check whether the values are correct.
Traceability to the national standard
The keyword here’s thus the traceability to the national standard. Understanding that the respective measuring instrument measures the right value can be of great importance for most applications. For example, ISO 9000 requires that the deviations of the test equipment used should be monitored. Having an up-to-date calibration, passing the audit is no problem. This avoids the repetition of the audit, production downtime or even a recall ? and therefore reduces stress, time and costs. The expenditure on the calibration has thus quickly paid for itself. Everyone is happy.
Besides meeting the audit requirements, traceability may also be required for quality assurance, optimising resource utilisation and reducing energy consumption. Finally, probably the most convincing reason to have one?s own measuring devices checked in accordance with the current standard is the feeling of security: The measuring instruments will continue steadily to provide the correct values!
Certification relative to the German accreditation body
The illustration shows the way the four calibration sequences in accordance with DKD-R 3-3 differ.
The highest standard because of this may be the calibration certificate of the German accreditation body (Deutsche Akkreditierungsstelle ? DAkkS). WIKA has offered certification for pressure, temperature and electrical measurands (DC current, DC voltage and DC resistance) for some time. Since the beginning of 2022, tecsis has been accredited relative to DIN EN ISO / IEC 17025 for the measurand force.
What a DAkkS-certified calibration of force measuring instruments means is shown by the example of high-end force transducers, which are employed in calibration machines. In their case, the test sequence follows the EN ISO 376 standard. At least eight measuring stages are approached, with a complete of five preloads, two upward series and two up-down series. Furthermore, the force transducers are each rotated by 120�, which results in three installation positions. With 65 measured values (eight stages), your time and effort is correspondingly high. Official for this type of calibration goes hand in hand with this.
Regarding industrial devices, the question arises concerning whether this type of procedure is worthwhile. Alternatively, the DKD-R 3-3 directive could be applied. It describes four test sequences that could be selected in line with the requirements. WIKA and tecsis likewise have DAkkS certification because of this.
An additional option for regular calibration may be the non-standardised 3.1 inspection certificate.
Practical examples
An illustrative exemplory case of the usefulness of regular calibration is the checking of hydraulic compression force transducers. These instruments gauge the clamping forces of industrial machines such as punches, pneumatic presses, sealing presses, spindle presses, tablet presses and toggle lever presses. Here, calibration provides a contribution to ensuring safe working conditions.
Another example may be the instrumentation for checking the contact forces of welding tongs. Ideally, these are monitored continuously by built-in tension/compression force transducers, but they can also be checked at set intervals using a test set for measuring electrode forces (model FSK01). This ensures the quality of the welding points and reduces wear on the electrodes.
For the tension/compression force transducers mentioned, calibration can be worthwhile, should they be used for monitoring very precise production steps. When pressing in cellular phone displays, for example, both the measuring instruments and their calibration can quickly pay back: If one in such a process isn’t noticed immediately (for example, if only the travel is controlled), several thousand euros in material value could be destroyed within minutes.
Adjustment before calibration can be handy
With regards to the instrument, application and regulation, it may be worthwhile to have an adjustment completed before calibration. In this manner, the user means that their measuring instrument achieves the corresponding accuracy during calibration. For the calibration itself, an individual gets the option of choosing the sort and procedure, both for our own and for third-party products.
Note
On the WIKA website you can find further information on the individual calibration services as well as on WIKA force measuring instruments (offers are also available in the web shop). For those who have any questions, your contact will gladly assist you to.
Also read our post
Calibration or adjustment ? Where?s the difference?